Introducing the Center for World Spirituality’s new blog with a global vision based on Integral principles

An Enlightenment of Fullness for the rising dawn of the 21st century

Daily Wisdom No. 9: Happiness is responsiveness to your deepest self

Happy Chef

By Marc Gafni

From Daimon Comes Eudaimonia

The novelist Honoré de Balzac wrote, “Vocations that we wanted to pursue, but didn’t, bleed, like colors, on the whole of our existence.” If we do not pursue our particular call, then the ghost of that call will pursue us, like a haunting that stains our days.

For when you respond to cues that are not yours, when you’re a police officer instead of a painter, ultimately you can’t be happy. Happiness comes from being yourself in the most profound way possible. The ancient Greeks referred to happiness as eudaimonia. “Daimon” is the word for calling. You are happy only when you are responding to your daimon. Your daimon calls you to realize your Unique Self. Your happiness lies in your hands, if you would but take it.

To be happy, then, is to be responsive to the call of your deepest self. To be happy is to wake up in the morning and feel that you have a mission in the world that no one else can perform. To be happy is to know that among the billions of people on this planet, you are irreplaceable. This is true for every human being on the face of the globe, for what we share in common is our uniqueness.

The Western notion of the sacredness of every human life bursts from the bedrock of the biblical-myth ideas that bring forth the idea of the Unique Self. The prospect of happiness exists for us only because the call of Unique Self animates the Universe.

The scalability of enlightenment

Jenga

By Joe Perez

Bestselling author Seth Godin describes “the scalability of money” on his blog. He writes:

You’re not half as annoyed when you get a $25 parking ticket as you are when the fine is $50.

An investment banker isn’t twice as excited about a $20 million bonus as she is about a $10 million one.

There are threshholds that determine how we feel about money-related events (good and bad), but beyond those threshholds, the relationships get all out of whack. Being a million dollars in debt feels about the same as being five million in the hole.

The way you feel about more (or less) of something probably doesn’t rise or fall based on how much it cost to produce that feeling.

Read the whole thing.

Here’s my follow-up question: Is there something related like “the scalability of enlightenment”?

If you are generally pretty convinced that life is meaningful, what you do is purposeful, and you trust in the universe or God, does it really matter where you rank in a diagnostic scale of ego-development maturity?

If you have mastered onespiritual technologies, one from your home religious tradition (meditation, scripture memorization, chanting, Aikido, etc.), does it really matter if you have mastered 3 or 4 of them? What if you mastered two different technologies from two different traditions? Does it matter that you haven’t mastered 10?

I suspect Seth Godin’s point has a correlate in spirituality. There are threshholds that determine how we feel about spiritual achievements, but beyond a certain point, it just doesn’t matter any more. Our spiritual homes are comfortably furnished, and we have little interest in remodeling or moving homes every few years.

What matters most perhaps is that we feel that our journey of seeking has gone out of the “lost in the woods” phase into the “accumulating wisdom and giving My Unique Gift” phase.

It’s time to stop talking about Enlightenment as if it were an Either/Or state of being. Ther is no such thing as, “I am Enlightened,” or “I’m not Enlightened.” There are degrees of brightness, fathoms of depth, arrays of lightness, and all the Levels, Quadrants, Lines, Types, and States of  Integral Spirituality (AQAL).

A better question is, “Is Our Enlightenment ‘enough’?”

And looking around at a world in disarray, with war, famine, gross inequality, gross lack of healthfulness, fear of death, fear of living fully, filled with destructive ideologies and -isms, and so on… the answer is definitely Not.

What do you think?